Foreclosures HELP
http://thehamptonsoffice.com
Foreclosures HELP

BANKRUPTCY PROCEEDING

Publicity in the East Hampton Star for this home...        
Click on the home to read all about it

2008 Real Estate update

December 2008 Real Estate update...summer rentals are being renewed, at less than last years' rates. Inventory has increased, but there are buyers on the sidelines that are planning to rent ...as we still live in paradise. The buyers' consensus is that they are waiting for market guidance on a few fronts...will the prices come down here like they have in other parts of the country...? and just as important, will the bailout have programs that actually reach the marketplace?
 
I published two plans specifically focused on the real estate market, with the latest by Barron's out since Sunday that calls for the government to sponsor a 4.5% mortgage rate for current homeowners and new buyers...across the board. It could be effected quickly through the disabled and nationalized Fannie and Freddie. What it would address that no other plan has, is help the people that are up to date on their mortgages, and are feeling the pinch anyway. There can be no plan that helps just a portion of the market without side effects. Imagine being up to date through struggles, and your neighbor gets a hand because they couldn't keep up...or just gave up?
 
I sincerely believe this would also inspire enough real estate buyers on the sidelines to venture forth a little more...and it would also stem the pending foreclosures, and allow some people to withdraw some of the excess inventory from the market. If there is a program that would effectively calm the mood, if not put in a bottom that we can work on, then it should happen now, or in the first 100 days of Obama's presidency.
 
It would also start up the economy machine and get money flowing...which could stem the pending deep resession. I've been wrong before, but this would work...like no other game in town.

JUST FOR FUN...

Just for fun...

...pick some of the following 20 questions to find out if your potential broker is the right one for you. I hope you'll pardon the shameless self-promotion, but we can think of no other way to impress upon you how important it is to have the right person handling the details of your family's affairs.
If you get too many "Uh..."s then you might want to think twice before picking them to handle your property. After all, if they can't handle these questions well, just how well are they going to handle the real time questions or objections, from potential buyers? How well are they going to handle negotiating on your behalf? Will they know what is happening when it is actually happening?

1- Do you live in the area?

2- All the time?

3-What have you sold, recently, and can you spell disclosure for me?

4- Do you know what  joist is? A Plinth?

5- What's the current code for a joist? and in North Haven?

6- Do you know what a wetlands indicator is, and can you identify one for me?

7- Can you amortize my buyer's mortgage for them...all by yourself?

8- Do you know what a back door is? In a contract?

9- How do you qualify your prospects without being rude?

10- How long will it take for me to get my house up on the internet?

11- Have you ever heard of a domino deal? How would you structure one for me?

12- What's the definition of a fixture?

13- How do you measure the square footage of a house?

14- Have you ever been involved in a bidding war?

15- From every different perspective? How many times?

16- What's the first thing an engineer looks for? Why do you suppose?

17- Do you know what the Income Approach is? How would you build mine?

18- When would the answer to #18 mean the difference between "In Contract" and "SOLD"

19- Have you ever built a house for a dollar? How many times?

20- This is a great one for your potential broker..."Are these questions making you nervous?"


If they can't handle most of these questions really well, just how well would they handle a potential buyer's questions or objections, (with your money at stake...)???
What about all the subtleties of negotiations? Nobody is perfect, but can they handle it for you reasonably well? Forget about the big corporate name on their card, because it is the agent that will be negotiating for you, not the big corporate name. This agent might have help available to answer a question...but do you want someone that needs help... in the moment they need it?
Feel free to call Simon (631)725.4357 or come by Simon Harrison's Hamptons Office for answers to these questions, and why they could be very important in determining who might be your best candidate.

 

How to Solve the Foreclosure Crisis

A Solution That Works

A Solution That Works: How To Stop The Housing Crisis Today

FDIC Chief Blasts Bailout For Not Helping Homeowners
Friday, October 17, 2008

Yesterday, the Chairman of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp (FDIC) — the organization that insures banking deposits — criticized the U.S. Government’s recent $700 billion rescue package as helping stabilize financial markets, but not doing enough to address home foreclosures.

FDIC Chairman Sheila Bair told the Wall Street Journal she’s perplexed that so much attention has been focused on institutions, and not on assisting borrowers.

“I support all the measures; I’ve been a part of all the measures that have been taken,” she said. 

“But we’re attacking it at the institution level as opposed to the borrower level, and it’s the borrowers defaulting.”

You can read the full story at Reuters.



Dan Gilbert Outlines His Plan on Fox Business News

Gilbert Outlines His Housing Rescue Plan for Fox’s Neil Cavuto

Last night, Dan Gilbert was interviewed by Neil Cavuto on Fox Business News’ highly popular “Your World” business news show.

During the interview, Dan Gilbert outlined the root problem that still persists at the center of the current financial crisis: The death spiral of mounting foreclosures, rapidly falling property values and billions of dollars in Option ARM loans set to start adjusting in early ‘09.

He also outlined his proposed solution, which would refinance the riskiest of those loans into a standard conforming 30-year fixed mortgage, without forgiving any principal — a key differentiator between Dan Gilbert’s solution and competing plans.

During the interview, Dan also took on the concern about rewarding homeowners who may have made bad mortgage decisions in past by pointing out that if foreclosures continue at the rate we are seeing, entire neighborhoods could be negatively impacted — including  the homeowners who have made their payments on time.

You can view the entire interview on Fox here.



Detroit Free Press: Two Propose Sane Fixes to Housing Meltdown

In this morning’s Sunday edition of The Detroit Free Press, Free Press business columnist Tom Walsh takes a look at two “sane” proposals to fix the housing meltdown: a plan from retired Episcopalian priest and head of the Detroit Office of Foreclosure Prevention and Reponse, Stephen Bancroft, and Dan Gilbert’s “A Solution That Works.”

Here’s what Walsh had to say about the plans:

The trick to making such a plan fly politically, Gilbert and Bancroft agreed, is convincing the 90% of homeowners who did not take out risky loans — and who dutifully pay bills on time — that they are not being punished for the sins of others.

Gilbert’s plan would not lower the loan principal owed by borrowers in trouble, he said, because that would be a red flag to people who are already pushing against rewarding irresponsible behavior.

While Bancroft’s plan would reduce the principal in some cases, the government would hold a 10-year lien on properties and reap 80% of the gains if home prices rebound beyond pre-slump levels. The goal is to stop the free-fall of prices, which is hurting everyone in what Gilbert called the “death spiral” in the market.

It’s not necessary to feel sympathy for people stuck in upside-down home loans.

And we need not feel bad for Quicken Loans, which has shrunk from 4,000 employees to about 3,200, even though it shied away from some of the riskiest loan products.

What we need is a solution that helps bring sanity back to housing, ASAP.

You can read the entire column by Tom Walsh here.

To read our complete Homeowner Rescue Plan, go here.


Senator Stabenow Says “A Solution” is “Persuasive”

Michigan Senator says bailout bill too costly; supports a plan similar to Dan Gilbert’s homeowner rescue proposal

Sen. Debbie Stabenow, D-Mich, told the Associated Press on Wednesday that Congress’ $700 billion attempted bailout of the banking industry was “too expensive” and didn’t address the core issues underneath the current financial crisis: the housing market and jobs.

Stabenow told the AP that she favored a less expensive solution that does a better job of directly addressing the housing crisis and said she found Dan Gilbert’s more focused and less-expensive plan “very persuasive.”

You can read the entire article in Forbes here.


The White House Solution to The Financial Crisis: Take Over The Banks?

White House considering taking over some banks, says AP, anonymous source.

 

The big news this morning is a rumor that the White House is considering taking over ownership of certain banks — the latest move in the government’s “Whack-a-Mole” approach to dealing with the current financial market crisis.

According to the Associated Press:

An administration official, who spoke on condition of anonymity because no decision has been made, said the $700 billion rescue package passed by Congress last week allows the Treasury Department to inject fresh capital into financial institutions and get ownership shares in return.

This official said all the new powers granted in the legislation were being considered as the administration seeks to deal with a serious credit crisis that has caused the biggest upheavals on Wall Street in seven decades and continues to roil global markets.

This rumor comes on the heels of yesterday’s emergency interest rate cut by the Fed, which reduced its key rate from 2 percent to 1.5 percent. In an effort to stave off the spread of the U.S. finance market woes, other global central banks followed suit, including the Bank of England, The European Central Bank and the central banks for Canada, Sweden, Switzerland and China.

Details on the possible U.S. government takeover of select banks are sketchy, but proponents of the plan argue it will inject fresh capital into banks, help them clean up their balance sheets and allow them to resume lending.

The problem with this proposal (like nearly every other tactic that’s been employed over the past three weeks) is that it treats a symptom, rather than the cause. While market psychology is complex, much of the current panic is being driven by a fear of more mortgage defaults, which will add additional “bad debt” to already troubled balance sheets of banks and financial institutions that hold these loans. Buying out the bad debt isn’t the solution. You’re just transfering the problem from private institutions to public ones — in this case, the Federal government.

A better solution, which is what we are advocating here at “A Solution That Works,” is to have the Federal government and private lending institutions work together to immediately refinance the worst loans (those in most immediate danger of foreclosure) by reducing the interest-rate dramatically, waiving prepayment penalties (which makes it cost-prohibitive for homeowners to improve their situation) and refinance individuals out of risky loan programs and into safe, secure, fully-amortizing 30 year fixed loans.

There is no need to tamper with the principal amount or have the government “buy up” bad debt (both of which were proposed by John McCain this week), because the homeowner is given affordable, long-term fixed rate financing that allows them to afford and make their monthly payments.  Once you’ve accomplished that, the risk of foreclosure on these mortgages is immediately and dramatically-reduced.  This makes lending less risky, reduces the future risks associated with having these loans on the books, and as foreclosures slow, would start to stabilize property values.

While the homeowner may still be in a negative equity situation, they at least have hope at the end of the tunnel and chance to equalize their equity as property values stabilize, and hopefully grow.

 

© 2008 Thanks, WordPress. veryplaintxt theme by Scott Allan Wallick. 

I have the answers...

 
...CNBC asked for CEOs to come forward and lead us out of the fray on Friday, Oct 9th...the day of the thousand point swing. Reluctantly I answered the call. I have enough economics training, experience, and a touch of arrogance to be dangerous...and I have nothing but theories anyway.
 
It's safe to assume that the worldwide markets aren't just correcting, they are broken. If the equity markets are shut down worldwide, it could allow the bailout measures, and other remedies at the disposal of those in charge), to take some sort of effect. Thaw the gears in the frozen credit wasteland.
 
The credit markets, (interbank lending), have to flow again for many companies to remain going concerns. The de-leveraging has to complete its course, and the main side effect is wealth destruction. Wealth was created by electronic means via financial vehicles like checking, credit cards, and the more subtle forms are only understood by some in Wall Street...derivatives, collateralized debt obligations, (CDOs) mortgage backed securities, (MBS) options (puts and calls), shorting, hedges, straddles, collars etc. All of these and more create multiples of actual dollars, layers of synthetic dollars...in fancier forms. Since risk is being re-valued, the 60 to 1 ratios of synthetic to real dollars have recenty been ratcheted down, and since there still isn't a market for the smaller ratios... it might have to get to historical ratios. History tells us that those ratios are often associated with the average price earnings ratios of fortune 500 companies. That's 10 to 1 and since we're way above that, Look out below...
 
 
 
If you think Education costs too much...
 
...you should see how expensive ignorance is.
 
I have a theory that is somewhat connected to the US government having the ability to print more money...and flooding the illiquid system. The side effect is that inflation will ramp up, and dollars will be worth less, meaning it will take more actual dollars to buy the same gallon of milk, the same widget, the same car and the same sheet of plywood. What will also happen is that the very expensive housing market will be supported in dollar values, and a floor will be set...which will set the stage for a recovery. The side effects will be too numerous to mention.  The minimum wage will not be enough, taxes will need to be adjusted, and everyone will just have to adjust to ten dollar milk...but since the market is already broken, let's make sure that housing is fixed. If you think that AIG is too big to fail, wait till you see how big the US housing market is...
 

Specific property consultation

Specific property consultation is available by appointment and includes;

 

1- Current market analysis including rent and sale options.

 

2- Strategies and other options to stay in your home.

 

3- Negotiating with your bank, including preparing for modifications.

 

To buy a foreclosure:

TO STOP A FORECLOSURE

For those under pressure with your mortgage, please visit the following links to New York State Banking dept as well as two local HUD-approved NON-PROFIT organizations that will help you apply for a loan modification. You DO NOT HAVE TO PAY for these counseling services, and there are many con-artists preying on people that need the help to avoid losing their homes. There are other companies, but check those out with NYS Banking first to make sure they are approved...here's a helpful link. 

http://www.banking.state.ny.us/hetp.htm

 

http://www.americandebtresources.com/site68.php

 

http://www.cdcli.org/services_subitems.asp?sid=1&ssid=33

 

If you need some suggestions about what to do, the first thing that all of these counselors suggest is to be proactive and contact NYS Banking, then your bank. It does take a long time for a bank to take the home, and there are many steps that can be taken in between that stop the sale. It could take years. 


TO BUY A FORECLOSURE

 

The reality about buying investment properties in default is three-fold...

 

1- Foreclosure proceedings can take a very long time, (and in Suffolk County it is rumored to be up to two years from a missed payment)...and a loan modification could take the place of a sale at the last minute.

 

2- If a property is foreclosed and sold at an auction, often the house has not been taken care of and needs at least some minor work, and sometimes a lot of work that one cannot see...nor have time to inspect properly.

 

3- Often a house is foreclosed because there is more owed on the property than it is worth. Read this as many times as you need to until you understand what it says. Foreclosures do not always represent a good deal.

 

Occasionally they do represent a value, as banks do not want to own real estate. They do not want to manage the properties, nor do they want to affect their ratios. Always keep in mind that banks are savvy sellers, and the buyers circling the foreclosures are also well versed and often experienced lawyers, sometimes they're sharks. Sometimes they're rank amateurs that are dangerous to even themselves. If you don't know which one you are, then you're probably not a shark...and you probably could get hurt.

 

There's also some negative energy attached to investing in foreclosures, and it isn't always pretty. Sometimes it's a business decision to let a bank take a home, and sometimes it is a family that met with unforseen circumstances. That might not be something you've thought about.

Downsizing the American home

Downsizing the American home
During the housing bubble, KB Home priced out first-time homebuyers by building bigger. Its new, more modest model provides a glimpse of what the return of the housing market may look like.


By Shawn Tully, editor at large

(Fortune Magazine)
-- In the history of real estate there are a handful of legendary homebuilders - William Levitt, who created Levittown on Long Island, being one, and then there's Eli Broad, who became a billionaire building tract homes throughout the Midwest and Southern California.

Surrounded by the famous Jasper Johns series "The Seasons" in his office 11 floors above Los Angeles' Wilshire Boulevard, Broad does not miss much. The 75-year-old real estate pioneer has seen bull and bear markets, and in recent years he watched as the company he founded (and cashed out of so he could focus on philanthropy) lost its way. During the bubble, KB Home (KBH, Fortune 500), like many other big builders, blew up its old-line business by going ritzy and building expensive houses. Now KB is among the first homebuilders to recognize the error of its ways, and it is returning to its roots as a purveyor of low-cost, smaller homes. In some cases KB is even using the same façades from the go-go years and then shrinking the house that lurks behind them to be half as deep - and about half as expensive. "If I had to write a headline for housing, it would be back to basics," says Broad. "The right thing to do is just what KB is doing: build starter homes that compete with rentals."

KB's recovery plan is not just a tale of two houses. It is a tale of two CEOs. During the bubble Bruce Karatz, a flamboyant marketer, believed that the public's hunger for McMansions would keep the good times rolling for years to come. It was his successor, Jeff Mezger, a hammer-and-studs operator, who recognized that the world had gone mad and steered KB back to first-time buyers. That strategy shift may prove to be a primer on how the housing market rejuvenates itself after a boom and a bust.


When owning is as cheap as renting

When the real estate market comes back, it will not be with a sonic boom. It is likely to be subtle, below the public's radar. The revival will probably begin in the areas hit hardest by the bust: in Florida, Las Vegas, and the honeycombed tracts that flank the broad freeways east of Los Angeles known as the Inland Empire. (Indeed, home sales in Southern California surged 22% from March to April, hitting their highest levels since August.) Why will housing come back? For a reason as solid as floor joists: The entry-level buyer, for the first time in years, is finding that owning a new house is suddenly just as cheap as renting. "Those first-time buyers got locked out by high prices," says John Karevoll of DataQuick, a research firm that assembles data on the U.S. real estate market. "Now the buying activity that was on hold is starting to come back."

In hindsight, the reason for the current malaise is simple: too few buyers. By 2007 more and more people were frozen out of the market - especially the entry-level buyers, who now account for as much as 30% of new-home sales. They're the twentysomething young professionals who rent until they get married or the first child arrives, and then reach for the American dream of homeownership. From 2005 to 2006 some first-timers rushed to purchase homes they couldn't afford with the help of exotic loans. But another big group of young consumers steered clear and are finally looking to buy. Now that prices of new houses have fallen as much as 30% in areas including the Inland Empire and the outskirts of Phoenix, they are returning- prompting a turning point in the housing cycle. Call it the New Affordability.

Three factors are driving the New Affordability: housing prices, house size, and the government's expanding role in the mortgage market. The experience of Richard Murkey, 28, and his wife, Kayla, 25, epitomizes the trend. The Las Vegas residents started shopping in 2006 but couldn't remotely afford the $300,000-plus prices that modest houses were fetching at the height of the frenzy. "Then, in the middle of 2007, we saw prices dropping, so we started looking again," says Richard, who sells safety products to construction sites. In January the Murkeys went to contract on a four-bedroom, Tuscan-style house at $246,000, more than $50,000 less than that KB model sold for 18 months before. It gets better. KB Home offered a program called "price protection" that guarantees that if the price of your model falls before the closing, KB will lower your price to match it. Result: The Murkeys got a discount that dropped the price from $246,000 to $213,000.
Nor was financing a problem. The Murkeys obtained an FHA-insured loan at under 6%, with a down payment of just 3%. Their mortgage, taxes, and insurance total $1,400 a month, a mere $200 more than the rent they were paying on their three-bedroom apartment. The FHA's role is something that housing bears have mostly overlooked: The FHA, Fannie Mae, and Freddie Mac are now guaranteeing more than 90% of loans to first-time homebuyers. The FHA is providing lending that the private market has stopped making to borrowers with blemishes on their credit records. Both the rates and down payments are extremely low.

Today seven in ten KB customers are getting financing from the FHA. The current rates are below 6%, more than 100 basis points under those on jumbo mortgages not backed by the FHA or Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac. (Fannie and Freddie lend less readily to people with past credit problems and hence aren't as crucial to the entry-level market as FHA financing.) Congress has raised the FHA limit to $729,750 in high-cost areas like Los Angeles through the end of 2008. But even if the limits aren't extended, virtually all the houses KB sells are priced for an FHA loan.

The houses themselves are being radically downsized to meet buyers' budgets. At the peak of the last boom, in 2006, KB's customers craved cathedral ceilings, formal dining and living rooms, and fancy wrought-iron railings on windows and balconies. Today's buyers, KB found, are willing to trade size and amenities for far lower prices. But they're extremely specific about what they want to keep. Buyers welcome houses half as big as the models that reigned at the peak, as long as they offer plenty of bedrooms. They also don't miss the formal living and dining rooms if KB provides a "great room" combining the two in one open space that includes a generous-sized kitchen.

Bargain-hunters are drawn to these small houses, which look just like the behemoths built in 2005 and 2006. In Beaumont, a community of tract homes 70 miles east of Los Angeles, the Seneca Springs community is dotted with 4,000-square-foot, seven-bedroom Mediterranean homes that KB built at the peak. But right next to them the company is erecting new houses with exactly the same 50-foot façades- and a big difference you don't notice from the street: They're about half as deep and roughly 2,000 square feet. Those homes preserve the community's curb appeal by keeping the façades looking similar and sumptuous. But purchasers love that the new homes boast five bedrooms, and they especially appreciate the pricetag: about $220,000, vs. $420,000 for the big neighboring homes built at the peak (and that now sell for around $300,000). Over time this New Affordability may swell the ranks of buyers. "What's been killing the market is people who are waiting to buy or incapable of getting financing," says Jonathan Dienhart of Hanley Wood Market Intelligence, a residential real estate research firm.


Downsizing the American home (page 2)
By Shawn Tully, editor at large

During the bubble KB lost its way. Building big, pricey homes wasn't a mistake- that's what the public wanted. The real problem was that management misread the future: It bought the illusion that the frenzy would last, and gorged on overpriced land. Management's grandiose thinking also pushed KB into splashy new businesses far from its traditions. KB began in 1957, when Broad, then 23, recognized that he could lure legions of first-time buyers from their Detroit garden apartments if he could build houses more cheaply than his competitors. His rivals were erecting classic houses with basements. Broad saw basements as an anachronism: Homeowners no longer needed cellars for storing coal. So his new company, Kaufman & Broad, erected houses on a concrete slab and used part of the savings to offer his suburban commuters a popular new feature, the carport. Broad's $13,700, three-bedroom starter homes carried the same monthly cost as a two-bedroom rental. "It was all about affordability," says Broad, "just like it is again today." By the early 1960s Broad had moved Kaufman & Broad to California and expanded into the thriving Sunbelt markets that, along with the Golden State, are still KB's main turf, chiefly Arizona, Nevada, North Carolina, and Florida. Then as now, KB built not only starter homes but also their cousins, inexpensive houses for customers moving up.

Market forces were partly to blame for KB's detour in 2005 and 2006. Builders could sell all the $400,000 homes they wanted, and the margins on those McMansions were a lot fatter than on small houses, chiefly because they could build them on virtually the same small lots as the old-fashioned starter houses. Still, some of the blame for KB's losing its way belongs to the CEO who succeeded Broad, his protégé Bruce Karatz.

Karatz led a high-profile life. He was married to the Food Network's Sandra Lee, was a regular in a skybox at L.A. Lakers games, and earned more than $40 million in fiscal 2005, ranking among America's highest-paid CEOs. Karatz launched a division to build high-priced urban condos and hotels in downtown L.A. Martha Stewart designed a special line of premium homes for KB: Her clapboard Katonah model, featuring colonial columns, dormers, oval windows, and transoms, sold for an un-KB price of $500,000 at the peak in Houston.

In Karatz's defense, KB was profiting wildly from the expensive houses it was building, and in 2005 the CEO predicted sales would double to $18 billion by 2008 (we'll get to the actual number in a minute). But a year later Karatz was forced to resign, the victim of a stock-options backdating scandal. (Karatz declined to comment for this story.) To calm investors, KB's board brought in Stephen Bollenbach as the new chairman. Bollenbach (who's a board member of Time Warner (TWX, Fortune 500), Fortune and CNNMoney.com's parent company) arrived from a tenure at Hilton Hotels that culminated last year in his selling the company to the Blackstone Group for an astounding $26 billion.

In November 2006, KB also promoted its longtime COO, Jeff Mezger, to CEO. In contrast to the flashy Karatz, Mezger is a brick-and-mortar operator. At 10 years of age, Mezger was attending planning-board meetings with his father, a Chicago homebuilder. His obsession is to make homes affordable but still offer features that sharply distinguish KB houses from the competition's. Jon Georgio, a landscaping contractor, recalls working with Mezger in the depressed market of the early 1990s in Antelope Valley, 40 miles north of L.A. "All the other developers were seeding front lawns, so the lots looked messy and unfinished while the lawn was growing," recalls Georgio. "Jeff insisted on sodding all the lawns to get a lush green look." By giving the landscaper lots of lawns to fill, Mezger persuaded Georgio to supply sod for close to the same price as seed. The gambit worked. "Jeff found a way to sell dozens of houses when few other builders were selling," says Georgio. The landscaper is quick to caution that Mezger can be a hoot outside the office: He's the proud owner of a 1963 Corvette and hosts Georgio for karaoke duels at his Bel Air home.


A strong balance sheet

It was Mezger who shifted KB's focus back to the customer who built the franchise, the first-time homebuyer. His coup was making the turn to affordability before such competitors as Centex (CTX, Fortune 500) and Ryland Homes (RYL). "By late 2005 we could see credit was tightening and investors were no longer buying," says Mezger. So he pitched his strategy toward producing the old KB product. "We needed to build houses priced for the median incomes of our communities," says Mezger. "We got away from that in 2004 to 2006." He also strove to build big financial reserves to provide KB with the staying power to weather the stricken market, for several years if needed. Hence, KB sold off huge landholdings and thousands of homes at a loss. In the fiscal year that ended in November, it posted a deficit of $929 million on $6.4 billion in sales, about a third of what Karatz predicted just three years ago.
KB is booking those losses because it's been selling homes and lots at well below the amount it spent to build or buy them. But it put out that cash years ago. Now Mezger is building fewer homes and acquiring less land than in the past. So despite the accounting losses, KB is taking in far more cash than it's putting out. As a result, it has increased its cash hoard from $700 million to $1.3 billion and has reduced debt by almost $1 billion, or 33%, in the past 18 months. "KB has one of the strongest balance sheets of any homebuilder, and the resources to get through the downturn," says Jay McCanless, an analyst with brokerage firm FTN Midwest Securities. Gone, too, are the noncore projects of the Karatz years. The new boss has dumped the corporate jet, and the annual report is a stapled SEC filing. "Who needs fancy pictures in this kind of a housing market?" he asks.
Mezger's back-to-basics approach depends on two variables beyond his control: land prices and labor costs. In Jacksonville, for example, the price for finished lots with roads and utilities in place tripled from $25,000 to $75,000 between 2002 and 2006. KB couldn't make money building its old staple and had to build big. By 2006 KB's median price in Florida had jumped from $180,000 to $270,000, and the size of its houses had ballooned from 1,800 to more than 3,000 square feet.

Today both land and construction costs are falling rapidly. In California's Inland Empire, the price per finished lot has collapsed, plunging from $150,000 at the peak to about $50,000. Labor costs, the single biggest expense after land, are also dropping as construction trades look for work. In Florida, construction costs for a 2,000-square-foot home have dropped to $80,000, vs. $100,000 at the peak, a 20% reduction. The result is that the average sales price there has fallen from $275,000 to $215,000. In the inland areas of Southern California it has dropped from $350,000 to $260,000.

Additionally, KB is cutting costs by assembling homes from prefabricated 12- and 16-foot panels that are hoisted into place with cranes.
That wasn't possible when buyers coveted fancier houses with custom elements.

So if those first-timers who sat out the era of the McMansions and the McMortgages start buying these modest homes, Mezger may go down in the annals of real estate as the man who saved The House That Eli Broad Built. He'll also need to expand his crooning repertoire. On karaoke nights, he usually caps the evening by singing "Unforgettable." Since his music collection harks back to the 1930s, investors are hoping that he may soon be singing another classic: "We're in the Money." 

First Published: June 4, 2008: 5:54 AM EDT